Notes to the annual accounts

1. Banks

The cash on bank accounts can be freely disposed of. All bank accounts are classified as Stage 1.

2. Current accounts (assets)

Current accounts can be freely disposed of and are classified as stage 1.

3. Short-term deposits

Short-term deposits are liquid accounts and are subject to an insignificant risk of changes in fair value. The Fund has on demand full access to the carrying amounts. Short-term deposits consist of money market funds, which are measured at FVPL. Short-term deposits have a maturity of less than three months.

4. Loans portfolio

Loans originated by the Fund include loans to the private sector in developing countries for the account and risk of the Fund.

The following table summarizes the loans segmented by sector:

For definition and more details on non-performing loans, we refer to section 'Credit Risk' within the Risk Management paragraph.

The movements in the gross carrying amounts and ECL allowances for the loans at AC are as follows:

5. ECL allowances - assessment

ECL allowances are calculated for Banks, Loans at private sector at AC (including off balance loan
commitments) and Guarantees Given to customers. The movement in ECL allowances for each of these items is presented
in their relevant notes.

To demonstrate the sensitivity of the SICR criteria, the tables below presents the distribution of stage 2 impairments by
the criteria that triggered the migration to stage 2.

The following table shows the values of the IMF GDP forecasts used in each of the economic scenarios for the ECL calculations for 2022 and 2023. The upside and downside scenario calculations are derived from the base case scenario, adjusted based on an indicator of public debt to GDP in emerging markets.

The macroeconomic scenarios’ model was updated following the publication of the new macroeconomic outlook data by
the International Monetary Fund (IMF) in 2022. The updates of the model based on more optimistic GDP forecast, caused
new point-in-time adjustments to probability of defaults in the impairment model, leading to a release in combined
stage-1 and stage-2 impairment charge.

Note that macroeconomic scenarios have been updated by using the latest available information by the IMF, as published
in October 2022. 

6. Equity investments

The equity investments in developing countries are for the Fund's account and risk. The movements in fair value of the equity investments are summarized in the following table. Equity investments are measured at FVPL.

The following table summarizes the equity investments segmented by sector:

7. Investments in associates

The movements in net book value of the associates are summarized in the following table:

Investments in associates are valued based on the equity accounting method.

The following table summarizes the associates segmented by sector.

The following table summarizes the share in the total assets, liabilities, total income and total net profit/loss of the associates

8. Other financial assets

• 1 Other financial assets at FV relate to FMO's Ventures Program

9. Other receivables

10. Accrued income

11. Other liabilities

12. Accrued liabilities

13. Provisions

14. Contributed fund capital and reserves

The fund capital is revolvable (100% revolvability) when the current value of assets is equivalent or above the sum of the capital put into the fund by shareholders.

15. Net interest income

Interest income

Interest expense

16. Net fee and commission income

17. Dividend income

Dividend income relates to income from equity investments.

18. Results from equity investments

19. Results from financial transactions

• 1 Other changes relate to results on FMO's Ventures Program

20. Expenses

Remuneration FMO relates to management fees paid to FMO.

Capacity development expenses relate to contracted contributions to beneficiaries in terms of the fund's objectives.
Evaluation costs relate to expenses made during frequent investigations and controls of existing investments and costs related to due diligence of new projects.

21. Off-Balance Sheet information

To meet the financial needs of borrowers, the Fund enters into various irrevocable commitments (loan commitments, equity commitments and guarantee commitments) and contingent liabilities. These contingent liabilities consist of financial guarantees, which commit the Fund to make payments on behalf of the borrowers in case the borrower fails to fulfill payment obligations. Though these obligations are not recognized on the balance sheet, they do obtain Credit Risk similar to loans to private sector. Therefore, provisions are calculated for financial guarantees and loan commitments according to ECL measurement methodology.

The outstanding amount for financial guarantees issued by the Fund is as follows:

As agreed with the Dutch Ministry of Foreign Affairs, the fund shall maintain 1 euro for each euro of guarantee issued. The total amount of cash as per 31 December 2022 is adequately covering the total guarantees issued and hence meets the requirement set out by the Dutch Ministry of Foreign Affairs.

Nominal amounts for irrevocable facilities are as follows:

The movement in exposure for the financial guarantees issued (including contractual commitments) and ECL allowance is as follows:

The movement in exposure for the loan commitments is as follows:

22. Analysis of financial assets and liabilities by measurement basis

The significant accounting policies summary describes how the classes of financial instruments are measured and how income and expenses, including fair value gains and losses, are recognized. The following table gives a breakdown of the carrying amounts of the financial assets and financial liabilities by category as defined in under IFRS 9 and by balance sheet heading.

Fair value hierarchy

All financial instruments for which fair value is recognized or disclosed are categorized within the fair value hierarchy, based on lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement as a whole, as follows:
Level 1 – Quoted (unadjusted) market prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities;
Level 2 – Valuation techniques for which the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement is directly or indirectly observable;
Level 3 – Valuation technique for which the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement is unobservable.

Valuation process

For recurring and non-recurring fair value measurements categorized within Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy, the Fund has a valuation process in place to decide its valuation policies and procedures and analyze changes in fair value measurement from period to period.

The Fund’s fair value methodology and governance over its methods includes a number of controls and other procedures to ensure appropriate safeguards are in place to ensure its quality and adequacy. The responsibility of ongoing measurement resides with the relevant departments. Once submitted, fair value estimates are also reviewed and challenged by the Investment Review Committee (IRC). The IRC approves the fair values measured including the valuation techniques and other significant input parameters used.

Valuation technique

When available, the fair value of an instrument is measured by using the quoted price in an active market for that instrument (level 1). A market is regarded as active if transactions of the asset or liability take place with sufficient frequency and volume to provide pricing information on an ongoing basis.

If there is no quoted price in an active market, valuation techniques are used that maximize the use of relevant observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs.

Valuation techniques include:

• Recent broker / price quotations

• Discounted cash flow model

• Option-pricing models

The techniques incorporate current market and contractual prices, time to expiry, yield curves and volatility of the underlying instrument. Inputs used in pricing models are market observable (level 2) or are not market observable (level 3). A substantial part of fair value (level 3) is based on net asset values.

Equity investments are measured at fair value when a quoted market price in an active market is available or when fair value can be estimated reliably by using a valuation technique. The main part of the fair value measurement related to equity investments (level 3) is based on net asset values of investment funds as reported by the fund manager and are based on advanced valuation methods and practices. When available, these fund managers value the underlying investments based on quoted prices, if not, multiples are applied as input for the valuation. For the valuation process of the equity investments we further refer to the accounting policies within these Annual Accounts as well as section 'Equity Risk', part of the Risk Management chapter. The determination of the timing of transfers is embedded in the quarterly valuation process, and therefore recorded at the end of each reporting period.

Other financial assets carried at FVPL represent amounts attributable to the Dutch State in return for their co-investment in the FMO Ventures Program. The amount attributable to co-investors is based on a predefined value sharing waterfall which utilizes the values of the underlying investments in the program. The underlying investments in the program are valued using the existing equity investment fair valuation techniques described in the paragraphs above. The waterfall calculation defines the timing and amount of distributions to respective co-investors and is therefore applied to estimate the fair values of the related financial asset.

The table below presents the carrying value and estimated fair value of financial assets and liabilities not measured at fair value.

The following table gives an overview of the financial instruments measured at fair value using a fair value hierarchy that reflects the significance of the inputs used in making the measurements.

The following table shows the movements of financial assets measured at fair value based on level 3.

The amount for loans based on a valuation with the credit impairment model includes one development contribution which is recognized as a loan, for an amount of €0.25 million. Due to the absence of future cashflows, interest rates and a maturity, the value of the development contribution is based on the disbursed amount and revaluation for foreign exchange adjustments.

23. Related party information

Dutch Government:

The Dutch Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Directoraat-generaal internationale Samenwerking sets up and administers the investments funds (“State Funds”), including MASSIF, according to the Dutch Government’s development agenda. Directoraat-generaal internationale Samenwerking is the main contributor to MASSIF, providing funding upon FMO’s request.

The Dutch development bank FMO supports sustainable private sector growth in developing and emerging markets by leveraging its expertise in agribusiness, food & water, energy, financial institutions, Dutch business focus areas to invest in impactful businesses. FMO is a public-private partnership, with 51% of FMO’s shares held by the Dutch State and 49% held by commercial banks, trade unions and other members of the private sector. FMO has a triple A rating from both Fitch and Standard & Poor’s.

Nederlandse Financierings-Maatschappij voor Ontwikkelingslanden N.V. (“FMO”)

FMO has been entrusted by the Dutch Government to execute the mandates of the State Funds: Currently MASSIF, Building Prospects, Access to Energy – I, FOM and Dutch Fund for Climate and Development Land Use Facility are under FMO’s direct management; the execution of Access to Energy – II and the other facilities of the Dutch Fund for Climate and Development are performed by third parties under FMO’s supervision.

FMO charges a management fee to the Dutch Ministry of Foreign Affairs and it is reimbursed accordingly from MASSIF’s subsidy amount (2022: €11.5 million; 2021: €11.0 million). FMO is also a minor contributor to the fund with a total contribution of €7.8 million in 2022 (2021: €7.8 million)

24. Subsequent events

There has been no significant subsequent event between the balance sheet date and the date of approval of these accounts which should be reported by the Fund.